ENNL
Menu
← All articles

14-day trial? Exantur: EU-hosted Delenta alternatives for coaches

14-day trial? Exantur: EU-hosted Delenta alternatives for coaches

Coach comparing software for client management

For coaches who value EU hosting and structured session documentation, Exantur is the recommended choice among the Delenta alternatives. The software stores data in Europe, works with a data processing agreement and is built around the coaching process itself, not as a generic scheduling tool. Even so, there are several good alternatives, each with its own focus. Below is an overview so you can decide for yourself what suits your practice.

In short:

  • Only platforms like Exantur offer EU hosting and a data processing agreement, essential criteria for GDPR compliance and data security in coaching practices.
  • It often varies whether a tool links session notes to goals and progress, which matters for structured trajectories in coaching.
  • Coaches should always ask upfront where the servers are located and obtain a data processing agreement before they use or purchase a system.
  • Prices vary depending on the number of clients or features, and full price transparency is needed to avoid unexpected costs.
  • Good mobile performance and fast customer service are crucial, especially for coaches who work on the go or need support quickly.

Table of contents

Delenta alternatives compared: which option suits your practice?

Anyone looking for Delenta alternatives quickly notices that the market consists of two types of providers: platforms built for the coaching process itself, and tools that come from adjacent sectors such as personal training, online courses or digital sales. That distinction largely determines whether a tool fits your way of working.

Below is a short introduction to each provider, followed by a comparison table.

  • Exantur organises the entire coaching trajectory: client management, session notes, goals and a dedicated portal for the coachee, hosted in Europe.
  • Simply.Coach focuses on simple scheduling and client overview, with booking as the starting point.
  • Everfit is built around programmes and progress, handy if you offer structured modules.
  • My PT Hub originally comes from personal training and works well for coaches with many training schedules.
  • Paperbell simplifies bookings and payments for coaches who want to streamline that process.
  • CoachHub is set up for organisations that want to scale coaching within teams.
  • Memberspot revolves around online courses and membership content, less around individual session guidance.
  • CopeCart is a sales and payment platform for coaches who mainly sell digital products.
  • nilo focuses on mental health within corporate and wellbeing programmes.
  • careertrainer.ai adds AI support to career guidance.
  • 21done puts the focus on daily actions and accountability between coach and client.
  • PocketCoach® OS offers a strong mobile experience for the coachee.
  • SHS Wellbeing Plattform is aimed at healthcare and wellbeing organisations.
  • Senoris and bondigoo are smaller players with their own niche within coaching and guidance.

This categorisation shows categories, not an absolute ranking. A comparison site with dozens of alternatives shows that choosing by category, such as booking-focused, messaging-focused or course-focused, usually leads to a good match faster than choosing by name alone.

Which differences do you really notice in your daily coaching practice?

Most alternatives overlap on basic features: a calendar, a client list and some form of messaging or notes. The difference lies in the depth. A tool that treats session notes merely as a loose text field works differently from a tool in which notes are linked to goals and previous sessions, such as the career coaching that is geared towards structured trajectories. For coaches who guide many individual trajectories, that linkage is often more important than an extra scheduling feature.

Privacy is the second area where the differences are large, even if that doesn't seem so at first glance. EU hosting means that your clients' data is stored on servers in Europe, which makes it easier to comply with the GDPR. A data processing agreement (DPA for short) is the contract in which the software provider sets out how that data is processed. Without such an agreement, you as a coach run a risk, even if the tool itself works perfectly well.

Privacy by design means that a tool collects as little data as possible by default and gives clients the option to view or have their own data deleted. Always read the privacy statement for countries outside the EU that are not designated as safe: that is often the first sign that a tool handles data less strictly.

Pro tip: Ask a provider literally where the servers are located and request the data processing agreement before you take out a subscription, not afterwards.

What should you watch out for before you switch or sign?

Switching to a different system takes time. This checklist prevents you from regretting a choice afterwards that seemed cheap or simple at first glance.

  1. Ask about the location of the servers. EU hosting is the simplest way to comply with European privacy rules, because transfer to countries outside the EU requires additional legal steps such as adequacy decisions or standard contractual clauses.
  2. Request the data processing agreement upfront. A provider that does not offer this as standard is a clear signal to dig deeper.
  3. Check the ability to delete and export client data. Can you fully erase data at a client's request?
  4. Test roles and access. Can you set who within your team sees which client data?
  5. Ask about a trial period or demo before you sign an annual contract, and during that demo ask questions about session notes, the client portal, integrations, invoicing and the ability to export your data if you later switch after all.

Red flags: no data processing agreement, a vague or missing privacy statement, or no option at all to delete client data. An audit of coaching practices shows that most mistakes arise precisely here: with undocumented arrangements with providers and the absence of deletion functions.

What Exantur delivers for coaches in practice

Exantur combines a number of facts that together form a concrete way of working. The software offers EU hosting, a data processing agreement and a structure in which session notes, goals and progress remain linked to each other within a single client's trajectory.

  • Session notes are recorded as observations, insights, breakthroughs and action points, searchable per client.
  • Clients get their own portal to view goals, complete check-ins and prepare for sessions.
  • Invoicing runs via a linked payment provider, without commission for the software provider.
  • A free trial period is available to test it yourself.

Important to remember: no software choice automatically makes a coaching practice fully GDPR-compliant. The coach remains responsible for how client data is processed, even with a well-functioning system.

Practical check: what should your contract and data processing agreement contain?

Before you sign, it is wise to read the contract and the data processing agreement together, not separately. The data processing agreement specifically governs how the provider handles your clients' personal data: where that data is stored, who can access it and what happens in the event of a data breach.

Pay attention to a few concrete points. Does it explicitly state where the data is stored? Is it described what happens when you cancel the subscription—do you get your data back or is it deleted? And is there an arrangement about the notification obligation in the event of a data breach? A coach is and remains the data controller, even when the software itself is well secured. That means you are responsible if something goes wrong with client data, even if the fault lies with the provider. A signed data processing agreement does not shift that responsibility away, but it does set out who has which tasks.

Four points of attention for a data processing agreement

Also ask about notice periods and the ability to export your data in a readable format. Some providers deliberately make switching cumbersome by making export difficult. You only notice that when you try it, so ask about it during the demo rather than finding out after a year.

Price comparison: how do the subscription models differ?

Most Delenta alternatives work with a monthly or annual subscription, where the price rises with the number of active clients or team members, although exact price increases differ per provider. Platforms aimed at organisations, such as CoachHub and SHS Wellbeing Plattform, often work with custom quotes instead of a fixed price list, because the scale can vary greatly per organisation.

Tools such as Paperbell and Simply.Coach base their pricing model around the number of clients you actively guide, which is attractive for small practices but costs can rise as the number of clients increases. CopeCart works partly on the basis of transactions, since the platform, besides coaching, also handles the sale of digital products. Exantur works with a subscription per coach or organisation and offers a free trial period at no cost, after which the subscription starts automatically unless cancelled in time. After the trial period, the paid subscription starts automatically, unless you cancel in time.

Don't just compare the monthly amount, but also what is included in the base price. A low entry price with separate costs for extra clients or extra team members can ultimately turn out more expensive than a slightly higher, all-in-one subscription. Always ask about the full price structure before you compare, not just the starting amount on the website.

Price comparison: how do the subscription models differ? — overview diagram

How satisfied are coaches with ease of use?

Ease of use is difficult to compare without testing a tool yourself, and reviews vary greatly per platform and per user group. What does stand out: coaches who switch from separate tools (calendar, invoicing programme, loose notepad) to one integrated system more often mention time savings than coaches who switch from a comparable all-in-one system to another.

Platforms built around one specific workflow, such as booking at Paperbell or programmes at Everfit, often score well on simplicity for that one purpose exactly. Broader systems such as Exantur require a bit more onboarding time, because more features come together, but as a result leave fewer separate tools that you have to manage individually.

Test this yourself during a trial period or demo instead of relying on an average star rating. A tool that scores well with personal trainers doing short training sessions does not automatically fit a career coach with longer, in-depth trajectories. During a demo, ask specifically about how the software handles your type of trajectory, and not just about the general features.

How good is the customer service at these platforms?

Customer service differs greatly between smaller, specialised providers and larger platforms that serve many customers at once. Smaller teams, often behind tools aimed at one specific niche, sometimes respond more personally and quickly because there are fewer customers in between. Larger platforms often offer more extensive knowledge bases and self-service options, but the waiting time for personal contact can be longer.

For coaches who themselves have little technical knowledge, the quality of support for questions about privacy and data management is at least as important as help with scheduling or invoicing. So during a demo, don't just ask how quickly you get an answer to a technical question, but also whether the provider can explain to you how the data processing agreement works in practice. A provider that can explain that clearly inspires more confidence than a provider that only refers to the legal text.

Also ask in which language support is offered. For Dutch and European coaches, Dutch-language or well-readable English-language support makes quite a difference for questions about data protection, where precision in the explanation counts.

Do these tools also work well on your phone?

Coaches increasingly work in between sessions, on the train or between other appointments. A mobile app or a well-functioning mobile version of the platform is then not a luxury but a necessity.

Platforms such as PocketCoach® OS deliberately emphasise a strong mobile experience for the client, which is especially valuable if you have clients complete daily check-ins. Other tools, such as platforms aimed at programmes or training schedules, often have a mobile app aimed at the end user who follows the exercises, less at the coach who does the administration.

For coaches themselves it is more practical to check whether you can quickly add a note on the go after a session, view a check-in or reach a client without waiting for a laptop. Test this concretely during a demo: open the mobile version, add a test note and see how smoothly that goes on a small screen. That says more than a marketing text about "mobile support".

Why the debate about Delenta alternatives often asks the wrong question

Most comparisons of Delenta alternatives treat privacy as a checkbox: does the tool have it or not. That is too simple. The question is not just whether a provider offers a data processing agreement, but whether that agreement means something in practice, and whether the coach themselves understands what is being agreed.

What I find underestimated: how many coaches choose based on scheduling convenience and only afterwards discover that their client data runs via servers outside Europe. That is not a matter of bad faith on the provider's part, but of a choice that was made too quickly. Booking-first tools such as Paperbell or Simply.Coach solve a real problem, just like messaging-focused solutions that respond to how clients want to communicate. But none of those categories are built from the coaching relationship itself, with session notes that stay attached to goals and progress.

My advice: don't start with the price list, but with the question of where your client data is stored and who bears responsibility if it goes wrong. Everything after that, from scheduling to invoicing, is secondary.

— Martijn

Try Exantur: EU-hosted practice support for coaches

Where many Delenta alternatives focus on one partial problem, such as booking, sending messages or selling courses, Exantur brings together client management, session notes, goals and a client portal in one EU-hosted workspace with a data processing agreement. For coaches who want to stop combining separate tools yet still keep a grip on where their client data is stored, that is a concrete difference, not just a promise on a website.

You can try Exantur free for 14 days. After the trial period, the chosen paid subscription starts automatically, unless you cancel before the end. Take a look at the best practice management software for coaches or read more about the Practice alternative from Exantur to see how the platform fits your way of working. Do remember: software helps you on the way to GDPR-aware working, but the responsibility for correct data processing always remains with you as a coach.

Sources

Frequently asked questions

What is the best alternative to Delenta?

There is no single "best" alternative for everyone. For coaches who value EU hosting and structured session documentation, Exantur is a strong choice; those mainly looking for simple bookings are better off with Paperbell or Simply.Coach.

Are all Delenta alternatives GDPR-compliant?

No. Not every provider offers EU hosting or a data processing agreement by default. Always check the privacy statement and ask for the contract before you assume a tool complies with the GDPR.

What is a data processing agreement and why do I need one?

A data processing agreement is a contract between you as a coach and the software provider that sets out how client data is processed. Without this agreement, you as a coach remain vulnerable in the event of a data breach or unclear data processing.

Does EU hosting automatically make my practice GDPR-compliant?

No. EU hosting reduces the risk of complex international data transfers, but the coach always remains the data controller and must personally ensure a signed data processing agreement and proper handling of client data.

Can I use WhatsApp for coaching without GDPR risk?

Personal WhatsApp or the ordinary WhatsApp Business app are generally not suitable for coaching under the GDPR. Only the WhatsApp Business API via a certified provider with EU servers and a data processing agreement is a legally sound route.

Do Delenta alternatives offer a trial period?

Most providers, including Exantur, offer a free trial period or demo. At Exantur that trial lasts 14 days at no cost; after that the chosen paid subscription starts automatically, unless you cancel before the end.

Recommendations