360 feedback software for coaching organizations
By Martijn Mauritz · Last updated 2026-09-27
What is 360 feedback software for coaching organizations?
360 feedback software for coaching organizations collects multi-rater feedback (self, manager, peers and external raters) against a defined competency framework, then presents the results so a coach and coachee can act on them. In Exantur the 360 is built into the coaching platform itself, so a review is not an isolated survey but a structured input that feeds the goals, programs and sessions that follow, with confidentiality-safe reporting suitable for an organizational setting.
Multi-rater feedback only earns its place when the framework is right, the raters are the right people, and the results are readable enough to act on. Exantur builds 360-degree feedback into the coaching itself, so a review is not a one-off survey that lands in a spreadsheet but a structured input the coach and coachee work with over the engagement.
Most 360 tools stop at the report. They gather ratings, draw a chart, and hand it back, at which point the feedback and the development work that should follow live in two different places. That gap is where the value leaks out: a blind spot surfaces in a survey tool, but the goal that would address it sits in a coaching system that never sees the result. Exantur closes that gap by keeping the review in the same platform the coaching runs on.
It is part of Exantur, coaching practice management software for organizations that run coaching at scale, so the feedback sits next to the sessions, goals and programs it should inform, not in a separate tool.
Competency frameworks you define
A useful 360 starts with the right questions. In Exantur a coach defines the competency framework the review runs on, the competencies, the behaviours under each, and the scale, so the feedback measures what matters for this organization and this role rather than a generic template. The same framework can be reused across coachees, so results stay comparable within a cohort.
For organizations, these frameworks can be shared at the org level so every coach runs reviews against the same competencies. That consistency is what makes cohort-level insight possible: when everyone is measured on the same behaviours and the same scale, results roll up into something an L&D team can actually read across a group, rather than a set of one-off surveys that cannot be compared.
Self, manager, peer and external raters
Feedback is collected from the people who actually see the work: the coachee themselves, their manager, peers, and external raters such as clients or partners invited by secure token. Self-assessment sits alongside the others so the review captures how someone sees themselves against how others experience them, which is where most of the insight lives.
Radar-chart results and self-vs-others gap analysis
Results come back as a radar chart with a self-versus-others gap analysis, so strengths, blind spots and over-rated areas are visible at a glance rather than buried in rows of numbers. The full report exports to PDF for sharing in a debrief or keeping in a development record.
Feedback that feeds the coaching
Because the 360 lives inside the platform the coaching runs on, its findings connect to the goals and development work that follow. A blind spot the review surfaces becomes a goal in a program; progress is revisited in later sessions. The feedback is a starting point for the work, not the end of it.
Confidentiality-safe reporting for organizations
A 360 only works if raters trust that their input will not be traced back to them. Exantur is built for that: reporting is confidentiality-safe, so an organization can see the development picture it needs while individual peer responses stay protected. Access is governed by org-level admin and enforced at the database layer with row-level security, and coach-private notes stay separate from what a coachee or a sponsor can see.
This is the difference between a review people answer honestly and one they hedge. When raters know their candour is protected, the feedback is worth acting on, and an organization can run coaching at scale without the results curdling into a compliance exercise. Exantur is GDPR-aligned with a DPA available, and all data is hosted in the EU, which matters when the review touches employee data.
Frequently asked questions
- Who can be a rater?
- The coachee (self), their manager, peers, and external raters such as clients or partners. External raters are invited by secure token, so they can contribute without an account.
- Can we define our own competency framework?
- Yes. A coach defines the competencies, the behaviours under each and the scale, so the review measures what matters for your organization rather than a fixed template. Frameworks can be reused across coachees for comparable results.
- How are results presented?
- As a radar chart with a self-versus-others gap analysis, so strengths and blind spots are visible at a glance. The full report exports to PDF.
- Does the feedback connect to the coaching?
- Yes. Because the 360 lives inside the coaching platform, its findings can flow into goals and programs and be revisited in later sessions, rather than sitting in a separate survey tool.
- Is individual rater feedback kept confidential?
- Yes. Reporting is confidentiality-safe, so an organization sees the development picture while individual peer responses stay protected. Access is governed by org-level admin and row-level security, and data is hosted in the EU with a DPA available.
- What does it cost?
- See the pricing page for current plans and what each includes. Prices are not hardcoded here so this page never goes stale.
See 360 feedback built for coaching
Request a demo and we will walk your L&D team through a real review.
